Silver Mining-The Bad News

The mining of silver degrades the environment through acid mine drainage. Acid mine drainage devastates fish and aquatic habitat, is virtually impossible to reverse with existing technology, and once started, costs millions of dollars annually to treat and can continue for centuries.

AMD occurs when sulphide-bearing minerals in rock are exposed to air and water, changing the sulphide sulphur to sulphuric acid. This acid can dissolve heavy metals found in waste rock and tailings such as lead, zinc, copper, arsenic, selenium, mercury, and cadmium, into ground and surface water. Certain bacteria, naturally present, can significantly increase the rate of this reaction. AMD and heavy metals pollution can poison ground and drinking water. AMD can destroy aquatic life and habitat. Silver is one ore body commonly mined that poses an AMD risk. Acid generation results from exposure to air and water. This means that the more surface area of rock exposed, the greater the amount of acid. During the mining process, hundreds, sometimes thousands of tons of rock are dug up and crushed each day. The acid then leaches through the ground and releases heavy metals such as lead, zinc, copper, arsenic, selenium, mercury and cadmium. Acid mine drainage can develop at several points throughout the mining process: in underground workings, open pit mine faces, waste rock dumps, tailings deposits, and ore stockpiles. Acid generation can last for decades, centuries, or longer, and its impacts can travel many miles downstream. Roman mine sites in Great Britain continue to generate acid drainage 2,000 years after mining ceased.  
     

What is being done to reduce the environmental impacts of silver mining?

  New technology which uses microorganisms for the recovery of silver from metal-containing streams is currently being implemented. This technology is targeted at using naturally-occurring, sulfate-reducing bacteria for the recovery of silver from ores, instead of the more traditional -- and more toxic -- cyanidation process. Aerobic bacteria catalyze bio-oxidation of low-grade, hard to treat (refractory), sulfidic silver ore. This step is currently being adopted by silver producers for freeing silver from base-metal sulfides (e.g., pyrite). A waste stream from the bio-oxidation step is used in a second step. Next, naturally-occurring, sulfate-reducing bacteria are used to convert the dissolved sulfate in acid mine drainage into a dissolved bisulfide leaching agent and to neutralize the acid mine drainage. These bacteria can use wood alcohol, grain alcohol or vinegar as food, and they are also capable of consuming hydrogen produced by the gold dissolution process. Silver dissolves in the bisulfide solution and is recovered with activated carbon or zinc dust. If needed, excess sulfur can be recovered as a byproduct. By using the natural sulfur cycle, the process provides a complete solution to the silver recovery problem. This process has several benefits. It is more environmentally friendly--the bisulfide leaching agent used is about 200 times less toxic than cyanide. Since its invention in 1899, cyanidation and its variants have been the processes of choice for extraction of silver from oxidized ores. Cyanide, however, is legendary in its toxic potency. Furthermore, with increasing awareness for the environment worldwide, containment, treatment costs and time spent on environment impact studies associated with cyanidation plants have skyrocketed. These factors have raised the economic hurdle necessary to justify a working mine. Environmentally acceptable alternatives could broaden the definition of an attractive mine, through reduction of the economic and environmental risks. In addition, preliminary results indicate chemical reagent costs could be 80 percent lower than cyanide.

Points to Ponder: